Skip to main content
Solved

EFNO gives different result to that calclated in relative illumination analysis


Hello,

I have a system with a non-circular aperture and therefore try to calculate its effective f number using the operand EFNO(effective f number). However, I get different results when using the operand EFNO, in comparison to the result given in the relative illumination analysis, despite the same setting is applied on both calculation.

 

(wavelength 3 is 0.555µm, and field 1 corresponds to 0 y field)

 

 

 

 

 

As can be seen above, one gives a value of 4.13(EFNO), while the other gives a value of 3.85. I think the latter one should be correct, but the question is why does one get different results here, do these two use different algorithms for calculation? How can I calculate this value in a Zemax macro conveniently if the result provided by EFNO is not trustworthy….

 

 

Thanks a lot in advance!

 

Best answer by Nicolò.Bassoli

Hi!

 

I don’t know if it’s too late, but I noticed that based on the selected sampling in the EFNO operand, the results can vary greatly. 

For example:

 

While the relative illumination plot give as EFNO a value of 1.604542.

The sampling of relative illumination is about 20

View original
Did this topic help you find an answer to your question?

2 replies

somehow the images are not showing up correctly… these are what I was referring to in the quesiton.


Hi!

 

I don’t know if it’s too late, but I noticed that based on the selected sampling in the EFNO operand, the results can vary greatly. 

For example:

 

While the relative illumination plot give as EFNO a value of 1.604542.

The sampling of relative illumination is about 20


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings