Skip to main content
Solved

Focusing a collimated beam from an extended source

  • August 19, 2024
  • 4 replies
  • 266 views

Shivam

Hi to all!

I have been trying to focus an extended source. In the context, I tried collimating it and then tried focusing it using a best form lens. However, spherical aberration adds to the final image. 

 

Source: https://www.thorlabs.com/thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=M280L6

To simulate source, I am using object height in field setting, gave three fields at 0.5mm, 0mm, and -0.5mm and selected object space NA in aperture type with value 0.7. Given wavelength is 283nm.

Fig. 1: Above image shows collimation
Fig.2: Above image shows spherical aberration present in design while I am trying to focus 
Fig.3: Siedel Diagram

Any assistance on what I am doing wrong or any other way of focusing this extended source would be appreciated. 

Thank you!

Best answer by Michael.Young

At 0.7 NA it will be very hard to compensate for spherical with just a few lenses and especially with off-the-shelf (OTS) lenses. Trying to compensate spherical and other aberrations, over the field (1-mm) makes it even harder. Furthermore, doing this at 283 nm is even more difficult. As you are probably aware, there are few OTS substrates that will be suitable for that part of the UV. You could use fused silica, CAF2, and sapphire.

You may consider a reflective system like an Offner relay that are commonly used in spectrometers. Dave Shafer has some good slides on those.

Finally, in a shameless act of self promotion, if you are committed to a refractive solution you may consider my paper on designing objective lenses from OTS parts. This could be done with fused silica. Optosigma provides many fused silica singlets and an AR coating in the UV that would be suitable (A51). For the first lens in the system, Edmund Optics has high-NA glass objectives in fused silica with 285-nm AR coats that would be suitable.

View original
Did this topic help you find an answer to your question?

4 replies

David
Luminary
Forum|alt.badge.img+4
  • Luminary
  • 336 replies
  • August 19, 2024

It’s hard to be specific without a look at the design file. You might have chosen off-the-shelf lenses which are not providing acceptable results. But with the current lenses I would try reversing the third lens.


Michael.Young
Ultraviolet
Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Ultraviolet
  • 42 replies
  • Answer
  • August 20, 2024

At 0.7 NA it will be very hard to compensate for spherical with just a few lenses and especially with off-the-shelf (OTS) lenses. Trying to compensate spherical and other aberrations, over the field (1-mm) makes it even harder. Furthermore, doing this at 283 nm is even more difficult. As you are probably aware, there are few OTS substrates that will be suitable for that part of the UV. You could use fused silica, CAF2, and sapphire.

You may consider a reflective system like an Offner relay that are commonly used in spectrometers. Dave Shafer has some good slides on those.

Finally, in a shameless act of self promotion, if you are committed to a refractive solution you may consider my paper on designing objective lenses from OTS parts. This could be done with fused silica. Optosigma provides many fused silica singlets and an AR coating in the UV that would be suitable (A51). For the first lens in the system, Edmund Optics has high-NA glass objectives in fused silica with 285-nm AR coats that would be suitable.


Shivam
  • Author
  • Monochrome
  • 3 replies
  • August 23, 2024
Michael.Young wrote:

At 0.7 NA it will be very hard to compensate for spherical with just a few lenses and especially with off-the-shelf (OTS) lenses. Trying to compensate spherical and other aberrations, over the field (1-mm) makes it even harder. Furthermore, doing this at 283 nm is even more difficult. As you are probably aware, there are few OTS substrates that will be suitable for that part of the UV. You could use fused silica, CAF2, and sapphire.

You may consider a reflective system like an Offner relay that are commonly used in spectrometers. Dave Shafer has some good slides on those.

Finally, in a shameless act of self promotion, if you are committed to a refractive solution you may consider my paper on designing objective lenses from OTS parts. This could be done with fused silica. Optosigma provides many fused silica singlets and an AR coating in the UV that would be suitable (A51). For the first lens in the system, Edmund Optics has high-NA glass objectives in fused silica with 285-nm AR coats that would be suitable.

 

Thank you so much! Adding more lenses helped! 

Note: ZAR and ZMX files are not supported. Upload these as ZIP instead. There is a 25 Mb limit on file attachments. Be sure to wait for your attachment to finish uploading before you submit, or you may lose the content of your post.


Shivam
  • Author
  • Monochrome
  • 3 replies
  • August 23, 2024

@David Thank you for the suggestion. 


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings