Hi all，
ZEMAX's help manual says that the FFT PSF of the off-axis field of view is calculated on an imaginary plane perpendicular to the incident chief ray of the reference wavelength, and the results of PSF calculated by FFT are generally too optimistic (ie PSF Smaller). Can you tell me why to calculate on an tilt plane？
Thanks in advance
+3
It’s because it is simply the Fourier transform of the pupil function. It doesn’t know where your image plane is, nor how it is oriented. The Huygens calculation is a rigorous calculation done on the image plane itself, so it is superior in this regard (and in all regards, except speed, though on modern machines I don’t think speed is such an issue any longer.
The golden rule: any differences between FFT and Huygens, trust the Huygens as long as it is adequately sampled such that increasing or decreasing the sampling does not make any significant difference.
Hi Mark
Thanks for your reply.！Your answer is great ! Then I still have another question： If we are not sure about the direction of the FFT diffraction surface, why do we still use the optical path data of the plane perpendicular to the chief ray when tracing the reference sphere?
Best，Nancy
Hi Nancy
Do you mean when plotting OPD or wavefront map?
In our software, the OPD and wavefront map used the reference sphere based on the chief ray. It is a quick way to assess the quality of the optical system. But then when we optimize, we actually reference the wavefront to an average sphere. This is what we call the centroid reference.
Sandrine
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Do not provide any information or data that is restricted by applicable law, including by the People’s Republic of China’s Cybersecurity and Data Security Laws ( e.g., Important Data, National Core Data, etc.).
不要提供任何受适用法律，包括中华人民共和国的网络安全和数据安全法限制的信息或数据（如重要数据、国家核心数据等）。
