Skip to main content
Solved

Problems encountered in optimizing the relay system

  • December 9, 2021
  • 6 replies
  • 290 views

When I am optimizing a relay system, the optimization method uses the spot, and the variable is the thickness. The software optimizes to obtain an optimal solution, but at this optimal position, the light spot on the image surface is not the smallest.

 

Best answer by David.Nguyen

Good job, if you want to keep the obscuration, you can also run an optimization with a Rectangular Array of rays as opposed to the Gaussian Quadrature. This gives you the opportunity to check Delete Vignetted to suppress the rays that would be terminated at the obscuration. However, it might necessitate more rays to get a good sampling.

Take care,

 

David

View original
Did this topic help you find an answer to your question?

6 replies

David.Nguyen
Luminary
Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Luminary
  • 1112 replies
  • December 9, 2021

Hi,

 

Without seeing the Merit Function, it is difficult to know what is happening. Would you be able to share your file? You can do so by pressing File..Create Archive.. and putting the resulting *.ZAR file into a *.ZIP and upload it in your reply.

When you did your manual adjustment, did both field got a smaller spot radius? By default, the fields are given equal weight, and there’s a compromise to be striked across the fields. It is possible to get a smaller spot in one field, but it would typically worsen the other one.

Take care,

 

David


  • Author
  • Single Emitter
  • 2 replies
  • December 10, 2021

Thank you for your reply

Sorry, the source file cannot be sent due to confidentiality。

The following is Merit Function

When I use the above Merit Function to optimize, the results obtained are as follows

There is only one variable, and that is the thickness of the 9th surface。

 

 


David
Luminary
Forum|alt.badge.img+4
  • Luminary
  • 336 replies
  • December 10, 2021

You might try increasing the rings and regenerate the merit function. 


  • Author
  • Single Emitter
  • 2 replies
  • December 10, 2021

I found the reason。

I added a circular obscuration in front of the lens.The software doesn't seem to consider this circular obscuration when optimizing. Therefore, the image surface position found by the software  is the best position when there is no circular obscuration limit.

When I remove this circular obscuration, the optimization result is normal。


David.Nguyen
Luminary
Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Luminary
  • 1112 replies
  • Answer
  • December 10, 2021

Good job, if you want to keep the obscuration, you can also run an optimization with a Rectangular Array of rays as opposed to the Gaussian Quadrature. This gives you the opportunity to check Delete Vignetted to suppress the rays that would be terminated at the obscuration. However, it might necessitate more rays to get a good sampling.

Take care,

 

David


Mark.Nicholson
Luminary
Forum|alt.badge.img+3

OpticStudio supports central obscurations natively, because they are so common in optical systems. In the Optimization Wizard, use the Obscuration control:

 

Just enter the radius of the obscuration in lens units. The docs give details. 

Also, be aware that the Zernike Annular feature exists to compute the Zernike coefficients in the presence of a central obscuration:

 


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings