I'm practicing optimization using a few operands.
The lens performance deteriorates significantly after optimization than before optimization.
I will attach the zemax file and PPT file.
Please understand that this is an old zemax version.
How can I make the optimization process go well?
I don't know what my fault is.
Please help.
Thanks
Best answer by Alissa Wilczynski
View original
+3
I opened up your file and ran an optimization. I can confirm that your RMS spot radius gets significantly worse after optimizing. If you look at your merit function editor in the column “% Contribution” what you’ll see is that 99.9% of your merit function value is coming from one operand:
MNCA is the minimum center thickness of air between two surfaces. You’ve set a minimum value of 0.1mm, and the current value is -0.094, meaning that there is a surface with a negative thickness. Let’s find which one…
This thickness isn’t even a variable, it’s one that you’ve set. So let’s first undo the optimization to get back to your starting point, update the surface range for MNCA from 1-11 to 2-11, and re-optimize. I optimized for only 45 seconds and then stopped it, to see if we’re heading in the right direction. I can now see that the spot size has in fact reduced as expected, and that the boundary operands are not contribution to the MF value at all.
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Do not provide any information or data that is restricted by applicable law, including by the People’s Republic of China’s Cybersecurity and Data Security Laws ( e.g., Important Data, National Core Data, etc.).
不要提供任何受适用法律，包括中华人民共和国的网络安全和数据安全法限制的信息或数据（如重要数据、国家核心数据等）。