Hello everybody,
for the type of product I am analyzing, I use the NSC environment where I have a LED source, an imported CAD and a detector to detect the luminance (or illuminance) of a system. In my opinion it is not necessary, in my case, to activate the "Use Polarization" flag during the analysis. Can you confirm it?
Thanks a lot.
Best answer by MichaelH
Hi Luca,
Polarization tracing in both sequential and non-sequential mode will account for both Snell’s Law ray tracing (how the ray physically travels through the system) as well as accounting for the E-Field (intensity and phase of a ray). You need polarization ray tracing if you can about:
+2Hi Luca,
Polarization tracing in both sequential and non-sequential mode will account for both Snell’s Law ray tracing (how the ray physically travels through the system) as well as accounting for the E-Field (intensity and phase of a ray). You need polarization ray tracing if you can about:
Hi Luca,
Polarization tracing in both sequential and non-sequential mode will account for both Snell’s Law ray tracing (how the ray physically travels through the system) as well as accounting for the E-Field (intensity and phase of a ray). You need polarization ray tracing if you can about:
Hi,
thanks for the clear answer. The most classic case for my work is the transmission through turbid polymers exploiting the scatter effect. I suppose it is not necessary to activate the polarization.
A thousand thanks.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Do not provide any information or data that is restricted by applicable law, including by the People’s Republic of China’s Cybersecurity and Data Security Laws ( e.g., Important Data, National Core Data, etc.).
不要提供任何受适用法律，包括中华人民共和国的网络安全和数据安全法限制的信息或数据（如重要数据、国家核心数据等）。