Skip to main content

Sequential vs Non-sequential; Which mode is more precise and reliable?

  • December 1, 2019
  • 1 reply
  • 368 views

I simulated an optical system in both sequential and nonsequential modes. I used a Gaussian entrance beam for my system and then, compared the results of "Physical optics" in sequential mode and "coherent irradiance" in non-sequential mode.
The problem is that the results don't coincide with each other!
Now, I want to know which one is more accurate and reliable?
Thanks!
Did this topic help you find an answer to your question?

1 reply

Ian
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Infrared
  • 14 replies
  • December 2, 2019
Sequential mode accounts for diffraction in a lens (although simplified to the diffraction at the exit pupil not each surface).
POP (within sequential mode) accounts for diffraction at each surface and can be set up for a coherent input beam such as a Gaussian beam. 
Non-sequential mode simply traces rays.  It does not account for diffraction at surfaces or at the exit pupil.  It does, however, allow you to model diffraction at a diffraction grating.  It also keeps track of the phase of a ray and so you can model coherent interference (eg in an interferometer).
Non-sequential mode will propagate rays even if part of the beam actually misses a lens or other component.  Sequential mode will not do that.  The main application is usually illumination systems. 

I would say the best way to describe the difference is that sequential mode is important when you are interested in the micro-scale, eg spot sizes and resolution.  Non-sequential mode is best when you are not interested in the micro-scale, eg illumination from a street light.

For your case it looks like POP would be best.

Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings