Hello everyone,
I have an optical design with an effective focal length of 250 mm. However, after adding a Schmidt prism, the effective focal length becomes -0.106 mm, whereas it should be around -205 mm. Could you please help me with this issue?
Solved
The prism changing the effective focal length.
Best answer by Jeff.Wilde
I took a look at your model. The lens system by itself, without the prism in place, has an EFL = 310.227 mm. If the prism is replaced by a glass block with the same equivalent thickness, the EFL remains unchanged as expected. The glass block has only flat surfaces and follows the lens system, so as
When the actual prism is included, then conventional paraxial analysis can no longer be used to find the principal planes, so the EFL becomes undefined or indeterminate. Zemax doesn’t return an error, but the reported EFL is clearly erroneous.
Here is a screenshot of your model with the three configurations shown.
Regards,
Jeff
Hi Baran
A prism with flat surfaces behind an objective should in principle not change the EFL. It will change the EFL however, if you put it somewhere within your objective. Can you make a simple drawing?
Regrads, Dusan
Hi Dusan,
I'm sharing an example file. In this configuration, the prism is placed after the objective lenses, and the system focuses after the prism.
Sorry Baran, but my version of OS doesn’t have a CGDM 2023 glass catalog and I also don’t have your STEP file (prism) among my objects. In this way I cannot help you farther...
Hi Dusan, I'm resending it with the necessary corrections and the updated file attached.
Hi Baran
First, I thought the problem is that meridional rays hit the Schmidt prism exactly on the roof edge. I decentered the prism in X direction, but it didn’t help.
Then I switched from your STEP file to Polygon Objects/Schmidt.POB. Schmidt.POB in Objects Folder had to be redesigned to obtain a roof. At the end I obtained EFL = 0.10mm, which is still wrong.
Sorry, no idea what is going on...
+3
I took a look at your model. The lens system by itself, without the prism in place, has an EFL = 310.227 mm. If the prism is replaced by a glass block with the same equivalent thickness, the EFL remains unchanged as expected. The glass block has only flat surfaces and follows the lens system, so as
When the actual prism is included, then conventional paraxial analysis can no longer be used to find the principal planes, so the EFL becomes undefined or indeterminate. Zemax doesn’t return an error, but the reported EFL is clearly erroneous.
Here is a screenshot of your model with the three configurations shown.
Regards,
Jeff
Hi Baran
I agree with Jeff’s explanation.
@Jeff:
Jeff would you be so kind as to help me with my “OS freezes while saving file” question from few days ago? There was no response on that until now…
Thank you very much, Dusan
Reply
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Need more help?
To Chinese users:
Do not provide any information or data that is restricted by applicable law, including by the People’s Republic of China’s Cybersecurity and Data Security Laws ( e.g., Important Data, National Core Data, etc.).
不要提供任何受适用法律，包括中华人民共和国的网络安全和数据安全法限制的信息或数据（如重要数据、国家核心数据等）。