Hello Joachim,

This distinction may come from the way that radiance is calculated in OpticStudio.

Radiance in position space is effectively the Incoherent Irradiance divided by 2 pi while the Radiance in angle space is the Radiant Intesnity divided by the product of the area of the detector and cosine of the angle at the center of the pixel.

For reference, these definitions are found in the Help System under the 'Detector Viewer' page. 

Hello Kaleb,

thank you very much for your quick reply!

Yes, in the general case the radiance 'L' is a scalar function of four variables, i.e. 'x', 'y,', 'u', 'v'. The latter two are the corresponsing cosine of direction.

L = L(x,y,u,v)

(Of course u and v can easily be expressed and displayed also in degrees [°].)

A very special and the easiest case is a Lambertian source. Here the radiance is not a function of the named 4 variables, it is just a constant.

L = const. (= P/(pi * A)

If the ZEMAX detector reports two different numbers for this constant, there are to possible interpretations in my view:

1. The two different detector views should not be named Radiance (in angle/position space) for they are something different. (btw, Radiance in angle space is correct, while position space is not.)



2. It is just a classical bug.

Now I hope for some resonance in the forum community. In the best case my reply triggers an internal discussion of the ZEMAX experts.

Thank you again, kind regards,


Joachim

Hi Joachim,

Thank you for your post! Since you also sent an email to support inbox so I replied to you via email and wonder if you have received it. 

As Kaleb posted above, the Help File at The Analyze Tab (non-sequential ui mode) > Detectors Group > Detector Viewer provides a description on how OpticStudio computes the 'Radaince (Position Space)' and 'Radiance (Angle Space)'. I agree that this is not the textbook definition of Radiance which should be a function of both angle and position simultaneoulsy. This is basically due to the limitation of displaying 3D data in a 2D plot, that OpticStudio cannot display the variation in angle space and position space at the same time. 

That said, I agree this could potentially cause confusition if the customer is not aware of that's how OpticStudio computes the Radiance (Position Space) and Radiance (Angle Space). I will discuss this with my colleagues to see if there is a better way of labelling this data in the Detector Viewer. Also, any comments or feedbacks in the forum from our users are welcome!

Best regards,

Hui