In some case, user may want to simulate fiber coupling efficiency and consider the effect of the material inside the receiving fiber (usually by assign material at Image Surface). And, there are two capabilities can be used for Single Mode Fiber Coupling - FICL and POP. Which one should be used in this situation? Or both?
Page 1 / 1
I would say POP should be used in this case, since POP will consider the material assigned after image surface correctly. For FICL, both Huygens and FFT algorithm, receiving fiber index cause imaging into glass gives incorrect coupling changes, so development team of Zemax removed the consideration of material after image surface intentionally.
This description will be added into Help Manual of OpticStudio at Fiber Coupling Efficiency section. And Zemax developers are working on it, to put fiber index back into FICL as new feature request now.
If there is huge coupling efficiency difference between POP and FICL in your simulation, we recommend you trust POP as the more reliable one.
If you need more details about this discussion, you can contact support@zemax.com.
Thanks!
This description will be added into Help Manual of OpticStudio at Fiber Coupling Efficiency section. And Zemax developers are working on it, to put fiber index back into FICL as new feature request now.
If there is huge coupling efficiency difference between POP and FICL in your simulation, we recommend you trust POP as the more reliable one.
If you need more details about this discussion, you can contact support@zemax.com.
Thanks!
Reply
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Need more help?
To Chinese users:
Do not provide any information or data that is restricted by applicable law, including by the People’s Republic of China’s Cybersecurity and Data Security Laws ( e.g., Important Data, National Core Data, etc.).
不要提供任何受适用法律，包括中华人民共和国的网络安全和数据安全法限制的信息或数据（如重要数据、国家核心数据等）。