Skip to main content
Solved

"Alternate" version of biconic surface

  • February 28, 2024
  • 1 reply
  • 99 views

Corey_Austin

I am attempting to model an x-ray beamline in a Wolter Type III configuration where the beam strikes the mirrors at grazing incidence angles. The mirrors I’m modeling have curvature in one direction, but are flat in the other, so I believe I need to use biconic surfaces. But I am only able to get rays to trace through my system if I set the second mirror to be an ‘alternate even’ (or ‘alternate odd’) surface. If I change it to a biconic surface, then the rays no longer trace through the system. According to the single ray trace, when the rays reach the second biconic surface, they ‘miss’, but I believe this is only because Zemax is choosing the wrong side of the second mirror. Is there a way to force Zemax to choose the “alternate solution” (as it’s called in the documentation) for a biconic surface? Or is there some other way to get rays to trace through such a sysem?

Best answer by Corey_Austin

Julia from Zemax support reached out and helped me with the issue above. 

View original
Did this topic help you find an answer to your question?

1 reply

Corey_Austin
  • Author
  • Single Emitter
  • 1 reply
  • Answer
  • February 29, 2024

Julia from Zemax support reached out and helped me with the issue above. 


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings